Replacement guns for losses?
I believe that the Union could replace any and all losses, except maybe trained crews. That is perhaps why we see so many D quality yank artillery sections in Gettysburg.
I remember reading that there were more than 200 unused rebel cannons captured at Vicksburg in the artillery depot when Pemberton surrendered. That makes it apparent that sizable losses could be replaced, as long as the manpower was available.
It becomes moot for me, even in campaign games. No big deal.
If it is a big issue for someone, negotiate it up front and remove cannons at the edge or move and hold them in an inactive corner. It does not concern me. I am inclined to treat it as "not an issue."[:)]
BG Ross McDaniel
2nd Bde, 3rd Div, III Corps, AoG, CSA
When asked "Is it worth risking my life to defend my property?", I ask "Is it worth risking your life to take away my property?" ---- "One cannot have a right to life without the right to defend it with deadly force." - Bruce Montague.
You don't have to go through life snarling, but it's knowing that you're willing to fight that keeps the other dogs out of your dish. -- anonymous
"Find out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." - Frederich Douglass
|