American Civil War Game Club (ACWGC) http://www.wargame.ch/board/acwgc/ |
|
streams http://www.wargame.ch/board/acwgc/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=13800 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | nealcarney [ Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:41 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Gentlemen: Pardon my obtuseness: if I melee one defender with two attackers, one attacks from the front across a breastworks, the second from the rear flank (no zone of control). The front attacker creates a negative adjustment for both, the rear attacker creates a positive adjustment for both--in effect, they cancel each other out? Correct? Thank you. Lt. Col. Neal Carney AoO/IX/2/6 |
Author: | D.S. Walter [ Thu Jul 16, 2009 11:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by nealcarney</i> <br />Gentlemen: Pardon my obtuseness: if I melee one defender with two attackers, one attacks from the front across a breastworks, the second from the rear flank (no zone of control). The front attacker creates a negative adjustment for both, the rear attacker creates a positive adjustment for both--in effect, they cancel each other out? Correct? Thank you. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> In principle, yes. Depending on the specific PDT used in the scenario, one or the other might be higher, so that you end up with a positive or negative modifier anyway. Gen. Walter, USA <i>The Blue Blitz</i> 3/2/VIII AoS West Point Class of '01 |
Author: | Net Warrior [ Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:30 am ] |
Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by D.S. Walter</i> <br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by nealcarney</i> <br />Gentlemen: Pardon my obtuseness: if I melee one defender with two attackers, one attacks from the front across a breastworks, the second from the rear flank (no zone of control). The front attacker creates a negative adjustment for both, the rear attacker creates a positive adjustment for both--in effect, they cancel each other out? Correct? Thank you. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> In principle, yes. Depending on the specific PDT used in the scenario, one or the other might be higher, so that you end up with a positive or negative modifier anyway. Gen. Walter, USA <i>The Blue Blitz</i> 3/2/VIII AoS West Point Class of '01 <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Per the manual: • If defending units are attacked from a hex side they are not facing, then 20% is added to the attacking strength • The <font color="red">largest</font id="red"> hex side modifier of all of the hex sides the attackers are attacking through is applied to the attacking strength. Likewise, if the attackers are attacking across a Breastwork hex side, then the Breastwork modifier is applied to the attacking strength. So is it correct to say that (with breatworks a 30% modifier) that meleeing thru a front hexside with breastworks plus a rear hexside that the defender gets a +30% modifier but that if there were no breastworks (0 modifier) then the defender would get a -20% modifier? Isn't 0 <font color="red">larger</font id="red"> than -20. Shouldn't the 2nd melee be at 0 modifier? Major Bill Cirillo 3rd Brigade, 1st Div. XX Corps, AoC, USA |
Author: | D.S. Walter [ Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Net Warrior</i> So is it correct to say that (with breatworks a 30% modifier) that meleeing thru a front hexside with breastworks plus a rear hexside that the defender gets a +30% modifier but that if there were no breastworks (0 modifier) then the defender would get a -20% modifier? Isn't 0 <font color="red">larger</font id="red"> than -20. Shouldn't the 2nd melee be at 0 modifier? <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Two confusions here. First the rear attack modifier is not a hexside modifier. These two are applied independently of each other. Secondly, the largest of several *negative* modifiers is of course the one with the highest value (largest percentage). The minus in front indicates a negative modifier, but that doesn't mean that, contrary to the common sense meaning (but admittedly mathematically correct [;)]) the "largest" modifier means the lowest percentage because it's closer to zero. Gen. Walter, USA <i>The Blue Blitz</i> 3/2/VIII AoS West Point Class of '01 |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |