ACWGC
* ACWGC     * Dpt. of Records       * CSA HQ    * VMI    * Join CSA    
   * Union HQ    * UMA    * Join Union     ACWGC Memorial
CSA Armies:    ANV    AotW
Union Armies:    AotT     AotC      AotP      AotS     Union Army Forums
     Link Express
American Civil War Books, Magazines and Games for sale (See other items)
Club Forums:     NWC    CCC     Home Pages:     NWC    CCC    ACWGC
It is currently Sun Dec 16, 2018 6:17 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Needed Corrections to the HPS Games
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2018 11:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:24 pm
Posts: 643
Location: Terra
LGen Harney wrote:
I see that the consensus is that Supply wagon travel is arbitrary and capricious. Up to the game designer, so be it.

I've put a question up for this:
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=20968


LGen Harney wrote:
Regarding the -20 penalty for "uphill" shooting I have seen no argument other than the Designer "Said So". Hecht's post and link prove that. Joe, you are mistaken concerning your theory about troops "jerking triggers".

In my opinion, there should be no penalty for ranged fire uphill. And as a compromise, there should also be a -20 for downhill fire.

Maybe the -20% is too much for simple musket fire, but unless we get a separate modifier for at least infantry & artillery fire I wouldn't change it. It's just not realistic to have artillery fire, especially with cannonballs, not be impacted by the target being on a higher elevation. Firing artillery downhill on the other had may not be a problem at all.


LGen Harney wrote:
One last question, why does this also apply to artillery?

Because the modifier for the higher ground is applied to all fire weapons, and why should it not? Cannonballs just down roll uphill very good.

_________________
Major General Christian Hecht
Commander I Corps, Army of the Potomac
Image
Union Cabinet Secretary
Support adding a AAR SUB-FORUM


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Needed Corrections to the HPS Games
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2018 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 4:13 am
Posts: 54
Location: USA
Howdy!

BGen. Hecht, you have seemed to missed my point. Which is that there is nothing Ballisticly relevant to a -20 modifier for uphill shooting. It's just a made up, arbitrary thing.

You forget, or do not know, that the Enfield Rifled Musket, Springfield Rifled Musket, and all other "Rifled Muskets" were capable of hitting a man size target at 500 yards. Granted, it would take a sober soldier for the shot, but anyway.

So why is shooting uphill so difficult? I just would like to know why?

Rob

_________________
Respectfully yours,

Lt. Gen. Rob (Festus) Harney, Commanding
The Pennsyltucky Zouaves


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Needed Corrections to the HPS Games
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2018 10:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 3:24 pm
Posts: 643
Location: Terra
I said it already, ballistics alone are not the only factor nor the decisive factor.
The constellation you point out might let the modifier seem too high. But when we talk about smoothbore artillery rolling the cannonballs into the target it may very well be not high enough(think of Waterloo or Gettysburg to see the low effect artillery can have on a higher target).
As I said, as long as we are stuck with a single modifier for all kinds if fire weapons, from rifled over smoothbore artillery to rifles, rifled muskets, smoothbore muskets, shotguns down to pistols we will always have situation where the modifier seems too high or not high enough.
The modifier i simply a compromise in an abstract game engine.

It's just the same as with the weapons fire values, we are stuck with a single fire value for a specific distance, but artillery uses a much wider range of ammunition in the civil war that had different effects in a range area where they overlapped. Just think of canister and cannonballs, on the same distance these would have different effect but we are stuck with a single value that is a compromise that factors in many things and not alone the type of ammunition.

_________________
Major General Christian Hecht
Commander I Corps, Army of the Potomac
Image
Union Cabinet Secretary
Support adding a AAR SUB-FORUM


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: