ACWGC
* ACWGC     * Dpt. of Records       * CSA HQ    * VMI    * Join CSA    
   * Union HQ    * UMA    * Join Union     ACWGC Memorial
CSA Armies:    ANV    AotW
Union Armies:    AotT     AotC      AotP      AotS     Union Army Forums
     Link Express
American Civil War Books, Magazines and Games for sale (See other items)
Club Forums:     NWC    CCC     Home Pages:     NWC    CCC    ACWGC
It is currently Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:42 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Revisiting Disruption Effects
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 3:20 pm
Posts: 1138
Location: USA
Should a disrupted combat unit in a JTS/HPS game maintain its complete zone-of-control? A routed unit currently experiences a complete loss of its zone-of-control. Why shouldn't a disrupted combat unit also have a portion of its zone-of-control negated? What if a disrupted unit could only claim control of the hex to its immediate front?

_________________
General Jos. C. Meyer,
Union Army Chief of Staff
Commander, Army of the Shenandoah
(2011-2014 UA CoA/GinC)


Image


Top
 Profile Send private message E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revisiting Disruption Effects
PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 4:32 am
Posts: 1639
Location: USA
It would lead to very unpredictable situations that would create exploitation opportunities. If you can't predict whether your unit can hold a part of the line the game is changed in a major way.

For example, in Turn play a unit is advancing and takes opportunity fire that disrupts it. Now it has practically no ZOC and can be easily surrounded by the enemy in his turn.

_________________
General Kennon Whitehead
Chatham Grays
AoT II/1/3 (CSA)


Top
 Profile Send private message E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revisiting Disruption Effects
PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 9:52 am
Posts: 951
Location:
Hi, Joe,

I can think of a number of changes I would like to see, but weakening zones of control for disrupted units isn't one of them. They are already penalized by having to fire at half rate, being unable to melee, moving slower, and being more likely to rout (-1 to morale checks). Most often they are only disrupted because unit with or adjacent to them routed or because they were involved in a melee, whether successfully or not. And I can't imagine what happens without rout limiting. Disruption is one aspect of HPS/JTS I would leave alone.

Speaking of routed units, though, I would like to see them given full movement allowance if not more. The initial rout is not the problem, just the movement allowance. After all, it took the Yankees three days to get to Bull Run and less than a day to get back. I have never understood the reasoning behind formed troops being able to outrun routed ones.

_________________
MG Mike Mihalik
Forrest's Cavalry Corps
AoWest/CSA


Top
 Profile Send private message E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: