<
             Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC) Forums
*    NWC     NWC Staff     NWC Rules     NWC (DoR) Records    About Us     Send Email Inquiry to NWC
*   La Grande Armée Quartier Général        La Grande Armée Officer Records     Join La Grande Armée
*   Allied Coalition    Allied Officers     Join Coalition
*   Coalition Armies:   Austro-Prussian-Swedish Army    Anglo Allied Army (AAA)    Russian Corps
  
                 Military Books, Magazines, Games for sale (see other items)
Forums:    ACWGC    CCC     Home:    ACWGC    CCC
It is currently Sun Dec 16, 2018 6:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Allied player for Waterloo scenario ( closed )
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2018 12:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 1:10 pm
Posts: 158
Location: USA
Bonjour Mis Amis,

I am looking for an Allied commander to engage in a modified Waterloo Campaign scenario. Specifically, I would like to play one of the following scenarios, # 044, #06 or #07. The major modification is to reduce stacking limits to 1050 infantry and 350 cavalry. This I believe makes for a more realistic battlefield.

I will supply the necessary new scn. file and altered pdt file with new names so they will not effect existing game files.

If interested please send courier to my HQ.

Respectfully, :frenchcharge:

_________________
General de Division Thomas Moore
1ere Brigade - Commandant
Division de Cavalerie
IVeme Corps
La Grande Armee


Last edited by Thomas Moore on Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:47 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Allied player for Waterloo scenario
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2018 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:55 am
Posts: 986
Location: Bouches-de-l’Elbe
Thomas Moore wrote:
This I believe makes for a more realistic battlefield.


Not really considering d'Erlon's attack formation that was likely the most dense used in the Napoleonic wars, you can't even achieve this with the original values not to speak of you 1050 limit.
Better to use optional rules that punish stacking and raise fire effectiveness.

_________________
Chef de Bataillon Christian Hecht, Corps Commander
La Grande Armée - 3éme Corps d'Armée
"Vive la révolution, vive la france and vive L’Empereur!"


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Allied player for Waterloo scenario
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2018 4:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 1:10 pm
Posts: 158
Location: USA
Hello Christian,

I think we have had this discussion before and I disagree with your suggestion of using the stock limits of 2000 infantry and 1000 cavalry for several reasons.

First, You mention D'Erlon's attack which was a disaster in great part because of the excessive density of the formation. The men were so compressed is that the forward ranks could not deploy in to line to provide fire for the formation. If you use the 2000 limit in the game you can make all the unrealistic attacks with little penalty. Defensive fire power will not cause enough damage to deter the assault. Also you end up deploying and moving around these large stacks like queens on a chess board. The 1050 limit I chose is a bit of a compromise figure due to the limitations of the game. Since the stacking limit applies to both line and column I chose a limit that could be used reasonably to represent the several varieties of column formations but not go to far beyond the 450 realistic max line formation limit.

Secondly, Using 1000 cavalry stacking limit turns 1000 charging heavy cavalry into a virtual battalion of tanks destroying all before it. Though you could physically maybe place 1000 cavalry in a 100m hex, you could not control the formation in a charge. According to the H & R boys the max is around 300 to 350.

Thirdly,Other benefits of reduced stacking are that reduced stacking helps encourage defense in depth so that brigades and divisions can cover a greater front and in depth. Also reduced stacking enables single battalions to be and effective defense force for a single hex in many circumstances.

Lastly, Much of my opinions are based on a wonderful article by the H & R boys titled;
" Historicity & Realism Project"
This article not only discusses realistic stacking but also unrealistic casualties and much more.I can not recommend this article more highly for all our members. The article can be found online under the above title.

_________________
General de Division Thomas Moore
1ere Brigade - Commandant
Division de Cavalerie
IVeme Corps
La Grande Armee


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Allied player for Waterloo scenario ( closed )
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 7:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 8:22 pm
Posts: 179
Technically if every man were packed into a hectare with 1m center mass to the men adjecent him you could fit 10,000 bodies in there.
The major point of contention I have with the game is how many shots can be fired in a turns worth of time from a battle line. H&R tried to re-evaluate logistics problems and only introduced different logistics problems without accomodating the base engine ruleset. This 1050 infantry, 350 cavalry parameter change seems unnecessary for limiting melee assaults. It denies fire density multiplier which I think is key. A better house rule for gameplay would be to embed melee (I think it's called) and prohibit the use of multiple units attacking out of a single hex per melee. That way you would need to surround a position to get ultimate assault odds with columns. Cavalry would also become less of a brute force due to their equivalence to infantry strength mano y mano after charge multiple.
I don't think my concept would be any more realistic than this H&R inspired pdt change or the standard methods. It would just be different. The base game cannot be reconciled with reality. It's a turn based hex wargame. Like chess^1000.

_________________
Lieutenant Geoff McCarty
45ème Régiment d’Infanterie de Ligne,
2éme Brigade,
2ème Division,
1er Corps d'Armée,
La Grande Armée


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Allied player for Waterloo scenario ( closed )
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 9:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2001 1:45 pm
Posts: 173
Location: USA
General Moore,

If you are still looking for an opponent I am interested. I like your ideas on stacking restrictions as I am looking for a way to play these games where both side rely much more on fire power than constant melees.

_________________
Marechal Jonathan Thayer
Regiment de Dragons de l'Imperatice
Cavalerie de la Vieille Garde
La Vieille Garde
La Garde Imperiale
La Grande Armée

thayer2544@gmail.com


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Allied player for Waterloo scenario ( closed )
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 5:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 8:22 pm
Posts: 179
This scenario certainly wouldn't be for you Jon. I'm playing Tom now and the inital weather parameters are low artillery, low musketry, normal assaults. Tom's French are just skipping down the road to Brussels. Kinda odd to modify a couple Waterloo parameters for realisms sake without addressing the other glaring flaws in the OOB, parameters, and starting positions.

_________________
Lieutenant Geoff McCarty
45ème Régiment d’Infanterie de Ligne,
2éme Brigade,
2ème Division,
1er Corps d'Armée,
La Grande Armée


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Localized by Maël Soucaze © 2010 phpBB.fr