<
             Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC) Forums
*    NWC     NWC Staff     NWC Rules     NWC (DoR) Records    About Us     Send Email Inquiry to NWC
*   La Grande Armée Quartier Général        La Grande Armée Officer Records       Join La Grande Armée
*   Allied Coalition    Allied Officers     Join Coalition
*   Coalition Armies:   Austro-Prussian-Swedish Army    Anglo Allied Army (AAA)    Russian Corps
  
                 Military Books, Magazines, Games for sale (see other items)
Forums:    ACWGC    CCC     Home:    ACWGC    CCC
It is currently Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:53 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 1815
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 12:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2001 8:49 am
Posts: 954
Location: USA
I agree with Andy's second point--the speed of movement. There are several reasons for this-a) hindsight means less need for caution, b) the movement rates (I really like the movement rates in the games Bill Peters has done as opposed to those in Waterloo and 1812), c) unrestricted night marching (no fatigue, etc). To address these things, there are harder fixes (coding night fatigue, pdt changes) and somewhat easier ones (house rules, fixing units at night, such as is done in East Prussia 1914)...

Ultimately, a lot of this is design decisions and also reflect the age of the game. Bill Peters went back and tweeked his games over and over based on feedback, his own growing experience as a designer, etc. Waterloo has not gotten the same love. Freezing the French for the first few nights to simulate traffic jams and Ney would be one way to go.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1815
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:14 am
Posts: 168
Location: Australia
Night fatigue, I am pretty sure would require an engine change.

Movement, no matter what title, is going to be dependent on the time scale used. I don't know that I have an opinion on this from one title to the next, yet apart from noting that Bill seems to have worked with different time scales with the titles he was working with (I am pretty sure Jena is using a different time scale).

Anyways - setting all of that aside, I sort of like playing the Nivellles scenario in this title -I don't know what that says regarding speed, etc - however the thing is, is that movement speed (as an aggregate consideration) is going to be dependent on morale, and if the user is using Line Movement Restriction.

_________________
[*]Hockey Coach
[*]RW/LW
[*]http://hist-sdc.com
[*]JTS Graphics Coordinator (one of them).


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1815
PostPosted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2013 10:55 am
Posts: 808
Location: Bouches-de-l’Elbe
AFAIK the movement range in Bill Peters games is even larger, at least in Leipzig infantry has 16 points per turn and uses 2 points on a pike what means they can make up to 800 meters per turn(10 min), I think in Waterloo you're slower.

The Night Fatigue OR would also not help much as fatigue is differently handled here than in the CW series what has the Night Fatigue OR.
I also don't see what one can do in the PDT as any change would affect both sides.

In general For night movement a houserule depicting the need for at least some rest could be handy, especially after a day of combat.
But it has to be noted that night movement did happen, on 15th June the first French formations started marched by 3 o'clock in the night.


Question is at what point do the French really trail off into a much better position than historically.
If the Allies only have a chance to win when the French make certain "mistakes" or simply chooses to do things differently that is of course a problem but that is a general problem in wargames, every designer for every wargame tries to depict the historical situation as exact as possible but after that it's usually up to the players to do whatever they want to do, of course designers make sure they still behave within what was historically possible but within that they are free.

Question is at what point do the French really trail off into a much better position than historically and is that really outside of the historical possible.

_________________
Capitaine Christian Hecht
La Grande Armée - IIIe Corps d'Armée - 3ème Division d'Infanterie
"Vive Napoleon!"

ImageImageImage


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1815
PostPosted: Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:34 am
Posts: 3673
Location: Republic of Galveston Texas USA
For an Allied play time is on your side hold them hold them. Let the Prussian beat them the Allied army as tool. I lost more 1815 games due to not holding them let the Prussian use their man power late in the game. Two choices attack early and destroy all bridges set up at waterloo and wait for the French to run out of steam. As for the short games 66 I never won one. I play maneuver games. As for Bill Peters I was the one he used to test some of his games.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1815
PostPosted: Tue Jan 27, 2015 12:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:21 am
Posts: 604
Location: New Zealand
Christian is correct

"Regarding speed, well I guess if the French player exploits his knowledge(or simply refuses to act as lame as Ney did) and goes directly without a stop to Quatre-Bras mostly ignoring the Prussians in the direction of Ligny there is not much one can do about it."

Remember there was some confusion and delay in the French initial movements due to the death of Berthier and Soult Chief of Staff and the issuer of Napoleon's orders. Also that turncoat that defected had a small delaying effect.

So hindsight being 20/20 Napoleon's plan is acknowledged by all to be magnificent. It caught the allies on the hope and it was just the execution that went astray. The Fog and Friction of war as its known.

The allies playing this have more knowledge of the plan than they accepted (Blutcher) or realised at the time (Wellington). Napoleon DID steal a march on them! So the allies have a fair chance to succeed knowing what they do now, they have options to either fall back in order to concentrate, with small delaying actions; or put up stout resistance early on in the hope of achieving major delays and loses to the French and concentrate for the final battle with all guns blazing. The Prussian guns are also very effective deployed correctly. So realistic options. The execution and player ability to counter the others moves will be the decider. Its not a forgone conclusion. The Allied forces combined ARE a very fine match for the French quality and command advantage.

I believe the campaign choices option with the large map is the best to try to change history without the initial French 'advantage' the allies seem not to be able to handle :frenchdrunk:

_________________
Vive L'Emperor!!

Général de Brigade Baron Mike Ellwood
2eme Regiment de Voltigeurs de la Garde
Duc de Bautzen et Comte de Monfort
La Jeune Garde


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: 1815
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2015 11:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 10:18 am
Posts: 5229
Location:
There is an artillery fire mod in the ver. 13 PDT file. Am not sure if this value was used by Rich White when he helped with the update.

Good point, Cliff, and the PDT files should have a reduction for Mud turns (I did that in the 1813-14 titles).

_________________
Image
General der Kavallerie Wilhelm Prinz Peters von Dennewitz
Husaren-Regiment Hessen-Kassel
Infanterie-Brigade Hessen-Kassel
Königlich-Preußisches Armee-Korps
Scenario Designer for Napoleonic Battles series - John Tiller Software
http://friendsofwargaming.com/support-bill-peters.html


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Localized by Maël Soucaze © 2010 phpBB.fr