<
             Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC) Forums
*    NWC     NWC Staff     NWC Rules     NWC (DoR) Records    About Us     Send Email Inquiry to NWC
*   La Grande Armée Quartier Général        La Grande Armée Officer Records       Join La Grande Armée
*   Allied Coalition    Allied Officers     Join Coalition
*   Coalition Armies:   Austro-Prussian-Swedish Army    Anglo Allied Army (AAA)    Russian Corps
  
                 Military Books, Magazines, Games for sale (see other items)
Forums:    ACWGC    CCC     Home:    ACWGC    CCC
It is currently Mon Nov 20, 2017 12:45 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Do we...
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 1:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 2:12 pm
Posts: 970
Location: USA
... have a two-rank infantry type that is restricted like the three rank R type?

_________________
Amos
Interested bystander


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Do we...
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 10:18 am
Posts: 5229
Location:
Not that I know of, Al. The OB guide for Leipzig lists all of the known types. If it is there it is one that John has never mentioned.

But I can check with him and see if maybe it was just never documented.

_________________
Image
General der Kavallerie Wilhelm Prinz Peters von Dennewitz
Husaren-Regiment Hessen-Kassel
Infanterie-Brigade Hessen-Kassel
Königlich-Preußisches Armee-Korps
Scenario Designer for Napoleonic Battles series - John Tiller Software
http://friendsofwargaming.com/support-bill-peters.html


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Do we...
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 4:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 2:12 pm
Posts: 970
Location: USA
Okay, thanks.

For the curious, if the Brits followed SOP (per Wellington's instructions in the Pens.), and stripped thier line bns of the light coys (forming an adhoc lt bn at bde level), then the Brit line would no longer be able to deploy skirmishers.

I'm building my British army for my "Al's Wargames" oob, and want to explore how it would play out, if the engine allows it. I see Rich W used R in his company level games, but that makes them 3-rank troops instead, not the way I want to go, but may have to. Of course since my OOB/Scenarios cover 1805-07, essentially, the 3-rank designation may not be too far off from proper practice.

_________________
Amos
Interested bystander


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Do we...
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 10:18 am
Posts: 5229
Location:
I do not know how true that is as far as their total inability to skirmisher. I do know that the Light bns. were formed as a means of inhibiting the French skirmishers and doing a bit of skirmishing on their own.

Wondering if this would not be a bad question for the Nap Series folks. Just had a nice discussion with them on the Prussians use of a 2 rank line. Consensus is that there is no consensus on that one! :mrgreen:

_________________
Image
General der Kavallerie Wilhelm Prinz Peters von Dennewitz
Husaren-Regiment Hessen-Kassel
Infanterie-Brigade Hessen-Kassel
Königlich-Preußisches Armee-Korps
Scenario Designer for Napoleonic Battles series - John Tiller Software
http://friendsofwargaming.com/support-bill-peters.html


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Do we...
PostPosted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 2:12 pm
Posts: 970
Location: USA
Yes, I followed the Prussian discussion. It appears designers have a bit of flexibility in how they would like to model the Prussian infantry. That is a good thing, imo.

As for British skirmishing.... of course they developed 'that loose flimsy order' during their experiences in North America from 1755-1781. That order though was an extended line, not the French style two-man skirmish team working semi-indepently. I think using the extended line button in the Nap engine is a good representation of that looser line formation, at this scale. I would like to see documentation of line coys (companies) despatching skirmish teams/lines similar to the French or even Aus/Prus practice.

In terms of regulations, it is my understanding that Dundas' regs shied away from thin formations and brought the Brits back to a 3 rank line. Of course it allowed for a 2 rank line to maintain frontage. As with the French evolution to the 2 rank line usage, Dundas appears to place frontage of a bn to be more important than number of ranks, but I'm not aware of him advocating skirmishing with the hat coys.

You're correct of course in that the Nap Series forum regulars would probably eat this topic up. :-)

_________________
Amos
Interested bystander


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Do we...
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 10:18 am
Posts: 5229
Location:
Official answer - no code exists for any other types of Two Rank Lines than what I have already listed in the OB_Guide.pdf file for Leipzig. For those of you that do not own Leipzig they are:

Two Rank Line
T - Line Infantry - can detach one company of skirmishers
U - Light Infantry - can fully breakdown into skirmishers
F - Guard Infantry - can fully breakdown into skirmishers

The other type that does not exist is the Two Rank Line Militia.

_________________
Image
General der Kavallerie Wilhelm Prinz Peters von Dennewitz
Husaren-Regiment Hessen-Kassel
Infanterie-Brigade Hessen-Kassel
Königlich-Preußisches Armee-Korps
Scenario Designer for Napoleonic Battles series - John Tiller Software
http://friendsofwargaming.com/support-bill-peters.html


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Do we...
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:24 pm 
The other issue involving British skirmish companies is that British battalions had ten companies. So if you go with a universal one sixth to accurately portray 1808+ french, the Brits get to deploy too many skirmishers per battalion.

I created adhoc light battalions or separate skirmish companies in british brigades in my Waterloo scenarios, taking one tenth strength from the battalions and combining them. I used three rank line restricted for british line battalions so they could not form skirms, but gave the brits better firepower than the french.

In any case, I don't care for the implementation of two rank line fire. Two rank line fired all their muskets, but not at plus 50% fire. Now if that applied [b]only[b]to extended lines (2 or three rank) of two adjacent units of the same battalion, I'd be fine with it...


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Do we...
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 10:18 am
Posts: 5229
Location:
What actually happens in the game is that we should not think of it as a factoring matter. Not that 400 men fired LIKE 600.

In other words the game actually is looking at the Line as factors and not men.

Thus 600 men in a 3 rank line under the "golden number" for Extended line actually fires with full firepower. The extra 200 men are factored in as if they extended to the right or left (or both).

So the 3 Rank line gets the 50 percent bonus too. Hope you can understand that they are getting a benefit as well.

_________________
Image
General der Kavallerie Wilhelm Prinz Peters von Dennewitz
Husaren-Regiment Hessen-Kassel
Infanterie-Brigade Hessen-Kassel
Königlich-Preußisches Armee-Korps
Scenario Designer for Napoleonic Battles series - John Tiller Software
http://friendsofwargaming.com/support-bill-peters.html


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Localized by Maël Soucaze © 2010 phpBB.fr