<
             Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC) Forums
*    NWC     NWC Staff     NWC Rules     NWC (DoR) Records    About Us     Send Email Inquiry to NWC
*   La Grande Armée Quartier Général        La Grande Armée Officer Records     Join La Grande Armée
*   Allied Coalition    Allied Officers     Join Coalition
*   Coalition Armies:   Austro-Prussian-Swedish Army    Anglo Allied Army (AAA)    Russian Corps
  
                 Military Books, Magazines, Games for sale (see other items)
Forums:    ACWGC    CCC     Home:    ACWGC    CCC
It is currently Wed Sep 19, 2018 2:02 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Needed additional Optional rules
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 1:10 pm
Posts: 156
Location: USA
Bonjour Mis Amis,

I have noticed for sometime the lack of new optional rules. Our brethren in the Civil War games have a much greater choice in optional rules. Is there a movement by JTS to add additional rules to our games?

There are a coupe of rules from the Civil War games I would like to see in the Nappy games'

1) Alternative Melee Resolution - This rule essentially creates a Melee Phase at the end of a movement. This rule essentially eliminates blitz tactics which has been a problem for ever.

2) Cavalry skirmishers - This rule really reduces cavalry from being ambushed when scouting.

3) Mixed Organizational Penalty - This rule helps in encouraging players to be more conscience of unit organizations.

Anyhow, I hope we see some new optional rules

Vive L'Empereur !!

_________________
General de Division Thomas Moore
1ere Brigade - Commandant
Division de Cavalerie
IVeme Corps
La Grande Armee


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Needed additional Optional rules
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 7:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2001 12:13 am
Posts: 563
Location: USA
No clue on what optional rule changes may come from John, though my gut call is unlikely.

I haven't played much ACW in a long, long time, so I've never played with some of these rules, but one jumped out at me a bit, the cav skirmisher one.

I'm a hair dubious of it in this engine. In part because some of the effects of the rule (greater MP cost to move through the extended ZOC) might work in a world of horse pistols and even breechloading carbines, but not so much here where most cav are saber armed.

If it were to happen, I'd want a couple restrictions on it

1) Light Cav only. Hussars and Dragoons might fit, but not the big boys.
2) The unit would have to recall skirms in order to charge (and thus, could not do so in the same turn)

_________________
Feldmarschall Freiherr Gary McClellan
IR44
Portner Grenadier Battalion
Austrian Army

Scenario Designer:
JTS Midway
JTS Seven Years War


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Needed additional Optional rules
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 9:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 22, 2001 8:05 pm
Posts: 377
Location: USA
The biggest one would be the alternate melee resolution creating a melee phase at the end of the turn. No more embedded melee house rule needed which would great as I always forget it. G

_________________
Field Marshal Mark Nelms


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Needed additional Optional rules
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 8:22 pm
Posts: 100
I think alot of hardcoded values should be changed. New functions surrounding melee are needed to make it seem more realistic. There is nothing wrong with a single phase turn if everything is properly balanced. This game would be exponentially better with modules like movement/fire range highlighting, artillery prolonge (not just backwards), several more cavalry charge modifiers, 50% firepower squares without ZOC, MP costs for firing and assaulting, etc.

A computer should be able to handle single phase turns alot better than tabletop groups might use phases and 300 pages of rules. It is a matter of detailing the function values which enforces 'realistic' behavior.

_________________
Lieutenant Geoff McCarty
45e Régiment d’Infanterie de Colonne
2éme Brigade,
2ème Division,
1er Corps d'Armée,
La Grande Armée


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Localized by Maël Soucaze © 2010 phpBB.fr