| American Civil War Game Club (ACWGC) http://www.wargame.ch/board/acwgc/ |
|
| Hancocks Division http://www.wargame.ch/board/acwgc/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=17818 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Olinsky [ Sat Jul 14, 2012 4:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Hancocks Division |
|
|
|
| Author: | Olinsky [ Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Gentlemen, Good afternoon! <salute> Isn't it amazing how you are trying to design a graphic that will perfectly fit into a certain forum. You preview it... and it looks great. Then you post it after hours of work and then it's TOO BIG!!! Crazy!! Ah well... I'm certainly not resizing it at this point! At this point, Hancocks Division is a collection of Officer's that have come together as an unofficial MP gaming group. We are currently engaging the infamous "Gator Alley" Division of the Army of the Mississippi under the command of Major General Neal Hebert. There is some rumor that they are the Confederacy's premier Division and that they are undefeated in Multiplayer Combat. With such fabulous rumors being circulated south of the Mason-Dixon line... we felt that it was time to put tall these TALL TALES to rest and for the real story to be told! As it turns out... Major General Hebert and his pet alligator Nicodemus are about the most entertaining actors that I've ever witnessed in my life and I just had to share this Vaudeville Act with you! For those of you that don't know what Vaudeville is... it was a performance made up of separate unrelated acts to include musicians, poets (Neal is quite the poet), dancers, comedians, trained animals (like Nicodemus), magicians, male and female imposters (much like General Strickler), acrobats, athletes (excludes Tennesseans) etc. So for your viewing pleasure... I'll be posting various comical details that arise in the course of the battle! Have fun... for we surely are! Colonel Greg Olinsky |
|
| Author: | Olinsky [ Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Here's a message that accompanied our battle file on Turn 1. Yanks and deserters, While we admire your audacity in challenging the gators, your punishment will be as devastating as experienced by those before you. The Confederate Army is on the march, and if you're pickets and spies can't quite make out the thunder in the distance it is the cadence being called as we march to victory: Nicodemus, he's our man He bit off Olinsky's hand Tried to put him in a sack Half his arm's what he got back Marching to the village Where all the Yankees shop I break out my machete And I begin to chop Left, right, left, right, left, right, Kill! It's not too late, you can scurry back to D.C. and save your sorry hides Nicodemus |
|
| Author: | Blake [ Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Nonsense the graphic looks great. I think it depends on the size of your monitor. On mine it fits nicely but I have a large monitor so I am not sure about others. You forgot to add pictures of the Union soldiers of your Division! Difficult I know because most are cowering under rocks. One of sketch artists did manage this drawing based on the last time we saw one of them in the open.  Feel free to contact me anytime for a MP game (pick your number of players). I am always happy to oblige. |
|
| Author: | Olinsky [ Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Here is Lt General Ed Blackburn's response. The Rebs are crying in their booze The Yanks made Nico into shoes He tried to bite old Fighting Joe Made a lunge but was to slow Nicodemus was a ripe old gator But tasted great with eggs and maters As luggage goes he was quite fine As boots his hide sure holds a shine Left, Right, Left, Right, and it’s on to Richmond!!! |
|
| Author: | Olinsky [ Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Thanks, Blake! I went ahead and resized the image a few times. I lost some image quality but at least it fits properly now. |
|
| Author: | Neal Hebert [ Sat Jul 14, 2012 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Gentlemen <salute> Gator Alley lays no claim to be the premier of anything other than kicking Yankee a$$. We have the record to back it up. Olinsky has his team which has accomplished nothing to date. You and General Strickler exchange pics and words, we'll fight the battle. |
|
| Author: | cameronm [ Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
The weird thing is that the division lists two members who are currently Rebs – so is this new division some sort of equal opportunity outfit, who 50% of the time fights for the Union and the other 50% of the time fights for the CSA 
|
|
| Author: | dukemat [ Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
cameronm wrote: The weird thing is that the division lists two members who are currently Rebs – so is this new division some sort of equal opportunity outfit, who 50% of the time fights for the Union and the other 50% of the time fights for the CSA somehow that just don't seem right. |
|
| Author: | cameronm [ Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Clint, I can only agree- it an't natural - to me it sounds like political correctness gone mad |
|
| Author: | Olinsky [ Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Gentlemen, At a minimum... there is at least a suggestion that there are fine Officer's on both sides of the Mason Dixon. And hope for the future in the fact that those wearing different colored uniforms can cooperate!  But anyone who has been around the Club long enough knows that those things are true!  General McOmish... you should have in your possession requests from Major General Sean Turner & Lt Colonel James Foster asking for your approval to muster out of the fine Confederate Army and General Meyer will have one from them requesting admission to the Union Army. I'm looking forward to getting all of these fine Officers in one Division... on one side of the Mason Dixon. <salute> Warmest Regards, |
|
| Author: | Neal Hebert [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
General McOmish <salute> Suh, my compliments! I believe the Yanks couldn't muster up enough elite officers and Colonel Olinsky resorted to trickery and bribery to entice two of our officers to shore up the Yankee effort. No doubt gold and silver exchanged hands along with promises of women and booze so long as they remained sober enough to remain in the saddle. Which end of the horse they were facing probably a matter of no great concern. I can't report any details of our current battle in order to maintain operational security, however Nicodemus does report that one of our former officers was spotted riding backwards in the saddle with tassles hanging from the seat of his pants. These are believed to have been acquired from a member of the Hancock's Division entertainment committee. A hell of a thing this war has become. Your humble servant, |
|
| Author: | cameronm [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Both officers concerned are fine southern gents, so I can only conclude that dark forces are at work – do I see the hand of Drex Vader/Darth Olinsky beckoning these poor officers to the dark side. Nicodemus will need to be ever vigilant |
|
| Author: | Blake [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 5:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Or, they could be just faking their Union sentiments in order to gain access to "locked" Union forums and then be planning to send us back the intel. Or, rather, confirm the lack of intel that they have. Not that we would ever contemplate doing such an under-handed and sneaky thing 
|
|
| Author: | Olinsky [ Tue Jul 31, 2012 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hancocks Division |
Gentlemen, Oh the wild things that are running through my head at the moment...  oh how my tongue is desirous of being unleashed... But as the commander of Hancocks Division, I've vowed to uphold a new Code of Conduct where... "At all times, he displays the conduct becoming of an officer and gentleman." As we speak... I am packing my bags in preparation to head off to a week long conference in Washington DC, where General Winfield Scott is teaching the finer points of being "an Officer and a Gentleman". The flyer that General Ringbloom gave to me... when he ORDERED me to go... said that "The phrase "an officer and a gentleman" means something. It harkens back to the age of chivalry and the code of conduct that knights were expected to follow. And this is not simply a European concept. Historically, the warrior class in nearly every civilization had a code of conduct which continues to influence correct behavior today. Perhaps such traits as courtesy, honor, discretion, politeness, and respect for others seem to some to be a little old fashioned in the 1860's, but they are still prerequisites to being a gentleman." I hope that I will be a good student and learn a lot... although I noticed General Ringbloom "DID" authorize me to stay an additional week if I have any difficulty learning these new concepts! Warmest Regards, |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|