| Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC) https://www.wargame.ch/board/nwc/ |
|
| MOE 4 Tournament Bracket Posted https://www.wargame.ch/board/nwc/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10002 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Sir Muddy [ Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | MOE 4 Tournament Bracket Posted |
<font color="red"><font size="5">YOUR FATE AWAITS YOU!</font id="size5"></font id="red"> [:D][:0][xx(][xx(][:(] FM Sir 'Muddy' Jones, KG 2nd Life Guards, Household Cavalry <font size="3"><font color="yellow">p.s. check the Club's front page; all scenarios are created by moi and are played "blind". I will send the scenario to only one side so that neither player knows the other's disposition. I hope to have the scenario in the mail by the end of the weekend. Good luck sirs.</font id="yellow"></font id="size3"> |
|
| Author: | dean beecham [ Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thanks Sir Muddy for getting this started . I do go away tomorrow . but have already emailed Ed . and will get the game started as soon as i am back. Good luck to all .[;)] <font color="red">Maréchal</font id="red"> <font color="red">BEECHAM</font id="red"> <font color="blue">La</font id="blue"> Commandeur, <font color="red">II Corps</font id="red"> ADN Prince d` Istria et Comte d` Arles La Jeune Garde 
"Toujours féroce,jamais étourdi" |
|
| Author: | John Corbin [ Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
My opponent has already surrenderd [:D] Seriously... I am contacting him and hope to start soon.. Great job Ken <center> </center> <center> [img]</center> <center>Monsieur le Marechal Baron John Corbin Commanding L'Armee du Rhin Grande Duc de Piave et Comte de Beauvais Commanding the Division de Cavalerie de la Moyenne Garde NWC President</center> |
|
| Author: | Colin Knox [ Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have found it now sirs! Muddy a quick question how do we choose the scenarios? Is it just by agreement between the player? General de Brigade Knox Baron de l'Empire 2e Regiment Gardes d'Honneur (the regaled pheasants) La Jeune Garde CO. 1er Brigade, III Division Cavalerie Legere, III Corps Armee du Nord http://www.aspire.co.nz/colinknoxnwc.htm 
|
|
| Author: | Antony Barlow [ Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thanks for getting this thing up and running Sir Muddy! It is much appreciated. I do battle with Marechal Lamezec. What an honour![8D] <center>[url="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/a.r.barlow/nwc/nwc_personal_record.htm"]Brigadier General Antony Barlow[/url] ~ [url="http://www.geocities.com/anglo_allied_army_stats/Anglo_Allied_Army_Cavalry_Corps.htm"]2nd British (Union) Brigade, Anglo-Allied Cavalry Corps[/url] ~ ~ [url="http://www.geocities.com/militaireacademie/dragoons.html"]4th (Royal Irish) Dragoon Guards[/url] ~  </center>
|
|
| Author: | Mark Eason [ Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Good job Ken Can I clarify rule S.3 Would I be right in thinking that a skirmisher can, in association with a friendly formed unit, melee an enemy formed unit? Regards Mark |
|
| Author: | Jon Graswich [ Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
This is my first time to particpate. What game are we supposed to play in the Campaign 1815 bracket? One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer, Major General Jon Graswich <font color="red">Commander Anglo-Allied Cavalry Corps Anglo-Allied Army / KMA Webmaster</font id="red"> 
<font color="blue">Royal Horse Guards (The Blues) <i>Honi soit qui mal y pense</i></font id="blue"> |
|
| Author: | Sir Muddy [ Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Mark Eason</i> <br />Good job Ken Can I clarify rule S.3 Would I be right in thinking that a skirmisher can, in association with a friendly formed unit, melee an enemy formed unit? Regards Mark <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> You are correct sir. FM Sir 'Muddy' Jones, KG 2nd Life Guards, Household Cavalry |
|
| Author: | Jeka [ Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sir Muddy do we have to choose scenarios or you will send to us battle files like in MOE3? <b>general-feldmarshal count Eugene Gulyaev Club Secretary RA Chief of Staff Leib-Gvardii Semenovskij Polk </b> 
|
|
| Author: | Yann Lamezec [ Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Antony Barlow</i> <br />Thanks for getting this thing up and running Sir Muddy! It is much appreciated. I do battle with Marechal Lamezec. What an honour![8D] <center>[url="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/a.r.barlow/nwc/nwc_personal_record.htm"]Brigadier General Antony Barlow[/url] ~ [url="http://www.geocities.com/anglo_allied_army_stats/Anglo_Allied_Army_Cavalry_Corps.htm"]2nd British (Union) Brigade, Anglo-Allied Cavalry Corps[/url] ~ ~ [url="http://www.geocities.com/militaireacademie/dragoons.html"]4th (Royal Irish) Dragoon Guards[/url] ~ </center>
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> Really my good general, all the honor is for me.[:D] I never crossed the sword with you and it is a good occasion for me to play a britannic gentleman. Tell me if I'm wrong or right, but so far I understand the rules (and it's not sure with my bad english) we must decide if we use NME or not, if we use the embedded melee, ... etc. I propose that you contact me at Yann.Lamezec@wanadoo.fr to discuss the matter. Best regards Marechal Lamezec Prince et Comte de Davout French CIC |
|
| Author: | The Highlander [ Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dear Sir Muddy, First, I too thank you for all of your efforts in putting this little soirée together. I do have a question and a couple of clarifications. Clarifications: 1. I recommend that rule S.5 be changed to read: S.5 NEW: Cavalry units with a strength of less than 25 men cannot, INTENTIONALLY, be used in covered terrain to block road movement of larger units (also see miscellaneous rule #8). 2. I recommend that Misc. Rule 8 be changed to read: 8. NEW: Formed units with a strength of 25 or less cannot move next to enemy units, may not be used to block retreat routes, UNLESS IT ENDS ITS MOVEMENT STACKED WITH OTHER UNITS, and should generally be withdrawn from the front lines whenever possible. Question: First let me say that IMHO, the Embedded Melee Phase is by far the best home made rule to be agreed to for HPS pre mech games since their inception. For me it put a stop to, what I considered, the ahistorical blitz tactics, that not having an EMP allowed. So my question is, what is the point of the EMP if any movement is being allowed after melee's are concluded? Therefore, I recommend that rule M.1 be changed to read: M.1 If the “no melee elimination optional rule†|
|
| Author: | Sir Muddy [ Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by The Highlander</i> <br />Dear Sir Muddy, First, I too thank you for all of your efforts in putting this little soirée together. I do have a question and a couple of clarifications. Clarifications: 1. I recommend that rule S.5 be changed to read: S.5 NEW: Cavalry units with a strength of less than 25 men cannot, INTENTIONALLY, be used in covered terrain to block road movement of larger units (also see miscellaneous rule #8). <font color="yellow">Yes, intentionally, of course. Honor.</font id="yellow"> 2. I recommend that Misc. Rule 8 be changed to read: 8. NEW: Formed units with a strength of 25 or less cannot move next to enemy units, may not be used to block retreat routes, UNLESS IT ENDS ITS MOVEMENT STACKED WITH OTHER UNITS, and should generally be withdrawn from the front lines whenever possible. <font color="yellow">Of course; if stacked with another unit then it would be ok. Let me caution, however, that such a unit could pose potential danger when stacked with another unit -- it is more likely to rout and take the other fellows with them. Best to direct it to the rear and safety.</font id="yellow"> Question: First let me say that IMHO, the Embedded Melee Phase is by far the best home made rule to be agreed to for HPS pre mech games since their inception. For me it put a stop to, what I considered, the ahistorical blitz tactics, that not having an EMP allowed. So my question is, what is the point of the EMP if any movement is being allowed after melee's are concluded? Therefore, I recommend that rule M.1 be changed to read: M.1 If the “no melee elimination optional rule†|
|
| Author: | The Highlander [ Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thanks for the speedy reply. In the case of EMP interpretation, we'll just have to agree to disagree. None the less, I am looking forward to forthcoming competition. Again, I thank you for all of your efforts. Captain Bill Spitz 1/27th Regiment of Foot(The Inniskillings) 10th Brigade, 6th Division Anglo-Allied Army [image]http://www.inniskilling.com/1850.jpg[/image] "Nec Aspera Terrent" "By Difficulties Undaunted" |
|
| Author: | Sir Muddy [ Sun Oct 12, 2008 4:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Sir Muddy</i> <br /><font color="red"><font size="5">YOUR FATE AWAITS YOU!</font id="size5"></font id="red"> [:D][:0][xx(][xx(][:(] FM Sir 'Muddy' Jones, KG 2nd Life Guards, Household Cavalry <font size="3"><font color="yellow">p.s. check the Club's front page; all scenarios are created by moi and are played "blind". I will send the scenario to only one side so that neither player knows the other's disposition. I hope to have the scenario in the mail by the end of the weekend. Good luck sirs.</font id="yellow"></font id="size3"> <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote"> <font color="yellow"><font size="4">It has occurred to me that I cannot give players the option to choose brtween the "no melee elimination" rule in HPS and an embedded melee phase. Thus, I have decided that the "no melee elimination rule" will be in effect for all HPS games. If both players object, then they can solicit the game master for an alternate file without this option turned on. Even the best of plans...</font id="size4"></font id="yellow"> FM Sir 'Muddy' Jones, KG 2nd Life Guards, Household Cavalry |
|
| Author: | Francisco Palomo [ Mon Oct 13, 2008 4:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Muddy, Thank you for your hard work putting this together and i look forward to the start of the ball [8D]! Regards, Paco <i>Maréchal</i> M. Francisco Palomo <i>Prince d'Essling, Grande Duc d'Abrantes et Comte de Marseille Commandant - Ecole Militaire Commandant - Division de Cavalerie de la Vieille Garde </i> 
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|