I thought removing forces would result in a 2 level victory penalty, or I would have done that, am I wrong.<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Bill Peters</i>
<br />I am in a game with Dwight McBride of Chancellorsville. There is a regiment of CSA cavalry that comes in in a woods hex along with four horse batteries. They are completely out in the middle of nowhere but behind the Yank lines. I ran the cav unit up the road but I exited the guns. The cav unit could get nowhere against his forces. I was not about to let the guns fall so I exited them from the map.
Again, had he known that that was an entry point he could have gathered near it but in this case his attention has to be on the Rebs to his front lest they overrun his lines. Still one cavalry regiment and four batteries are not going to flank him. So I removed the guns and am in the process of pulling the cavalry well back from the action.
There are just some things that were done in history that we cannot replicate. The numbers for instance: 300 cannot chase 1200 in this game series as its all about the numbers for the most part unless the morale of the larger force is E or F. Sometimes D.
So there are reasons why the units arrive where they do and guys like Rich Walker cant be blamed for that (and noone is doing that here) but its up to us how we want to use those forces and if its in our best interests to not use them at all then I think that is correct.
Brig Gen Bill Peters, The Boise Rifles, II Corps Artillery, AoA
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Lt. Gen. D. Groce
Commander
V Corps AotP
"beyond our ideas of right and wrong there is a field, I will meet you there"
