Generally agreed about mirror matches.
In fact I am surprised more Rebs don't insist on them given that so many (by no means all) of the histoical scenarios have IMHO a Union advantage. And of course for Shiloh, Chickamauga, New Market, etc ... darn right I want to play the mirror [:D].
I would add that the consecutive mirror still gives an advantage to the one who is the attacker in the 2nd match as he has detailed knowledge about the defense and generally more lattitude in using his forces.
While the simultaneous mirror corrects this, it lacks that wonderful uncertainty of your first time with a scn.
Even with a match you have played before it is unusual (for me anyway) to remember the OOB and reinforcements exactly, so there is still uncertainty. In a simultaneous mirror there is no doubt, which I find detracts from my enjoyment.
But all of this is very geared towards BG and stand alone HPS scns - is anyone playing mirror campaigns?
<center>Maj Gen Mike Kaulbars
Commandant
Union Army War College

</center>
<center><font size="4"><i>"Intel gives us the edge..."</i></font id="size4">

</center>