Yes, I agree.
A 6 gun battery should not all of the sudden become uncrewed because of a lucky shot. I'll take this up with the highest authority!

Really!
Rich
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Bill Peters</i>
<br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Pierre D</i>
<br />There are other issues with artillery. Too easily eliminated and their high victory points. I think that they should take casulaties in crew which reduces their effectiveness and not eliminate all the crew. The casualties should be as per regular inf fire. If they are melee'd, they should take losses in crew, be disrupted and retreat limbered. The overall losses would be reduced I think. The losses would reflect both men and animals. Victory points would be based on crew kill which can be equivalent to gun losses. Some thoughts.
Best Regards,
General Pierre D.
1st Bde,3rd Div,I Corps,
Army of Georgia
CSA
President, ACWGC
Cabinet Member
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
This one goes back quite a ways. Have wanted the same thing in the Napoleonic series. More of a gradual draining away of the ability of the men to man the guns than a total loss.
Am all for it.
Col. Peters, 3rd Brigade
2nd Cavalry Division, II Corps, AoA
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">