MCJones1810 wrote:
This is just a suggestion, mind you, but I find it is usually best if you
negotiate the Optional Rules for any game. A careful selection of unbalancing Optional Rules by your opponent can ensure that you will most likely lose any game before it is ever started. I have seen some young Coalition officers make this same mistake recently. Allowing your opponent to
suggest the Optional Rules under which he would like to engage is perfectly fine, but it is safer to always reserve the right to negotiate the final setup before playing. When I was a young officer, just embarking on my new career, I would consult with my veteran Trainer to be certain that the scenario and rules under which I was about to engage were fair and balanced.
I just hate to see promising young men walk into blind alleys from which they are unlikely to return. 'Blanket Party' anyone?

thank you...........I understand what you telling me.
the optional rules in the Napoleonic games seem somewhat confusing to me.
not really sure which to insist on........or not.
I have some experience on the other side (ACWGC) and most play with all optional except MDF and no art capture.
I have tried to discern what the majority (is there a standard) uses for optional rules.........to no avail.
sooooooo for the first few games I would defer to my honorable opponent.......except no multiple infantry melee's.......lol
in any case.......I would always reserve my right to negotiate the rules.
but anyway..........thank you very much for your "heads up"