<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Mike Ellwood</i>
<font color="orange"><font size="6"><b>Go big!</b></font id="size6"></font id="orange">
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Permission to disagree. I find the rather gigantic pictures in some signatures make this board harder to read. Between graphics and many text lines in signatures, it takes a lot scrolling to find the actual message of the posters. In addition, the habit of some fine officers to *always* quote the entire message of the previous poster (instead of just the relevant lines, if necessary at all), including all graphics and signatures--and sometimes the next poster quotes the quote, etc. ad infinitum--often creates threads where five or six lines of actual message are buried in the equivalent of so many *pages* of scrolling.
In short, I think short signatures, small graphics, and short replies with brief quotes are beautiful. Then of course I *do* love <i>Scotland Forever</i>. [8D]
<center>
[url="http://home.arcor.de/dierk_walter/NWC/2nd_Dragoons.htm"]

[/url]
Maj. Gen. D.S. "Green Horse" Walter
~ 2nd Dragoons (Royal Scots Greys) ~
2nd (Union) Brigade, Anglo-Allied Cavalry Corps
----------
~ 3rd (Prince of Wales's) Dragoon Guards ~
[url="http://www.geocities.com/militaireacademie/"]

[/url]
</center>