davidguegan wrote:
I am not sure to understand what you mean... What does rapes and Staline have to do with the battle of Berezina?

As amateur historians we have to do our best to detach ourselves from National pride and politics.
David,
It's a grotesque not far away from The Chewbacca defense (see here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clKi92j6eLE). I agree, being translated it lost most of the charm.
I must say, that I too respect greatly the French people and their feat on the field of battle during the Napoleonic wars (and the following wars but it's not the subject of this club). They were resilient and formidable fighter, one just have to look at the battle of Borodino (or as you call it in France la Bataille de la Moskova RIVIERE) to see what they were capable of.
What I meant, and what is in line with your
davidguegan wrote:
I mean sure the Battle is a tragic loss for the French Army (and its allies) tactically when you look at numbers; there is no doubt about it but you have to recognize that the Russians couldn't finish them. The army was able to escape at a great cost, but it did escape. The Partouneaux's division sacrifice in the South helped the main army in the north. It took some time to the Russians to realize that the crossing was taking place in the north.
is that a normal unbiassed study may not be substituted with idealogical stamps. We had such a period and finally overcame it. Nowday, among terricons of garbage, we have quite a few brilliant studies of the era. I can only regret you guys do not know Russian. The waterbreak is simple. Does the study use primary sources from both sides or not. If it does not, it principially can't be unbiassed. Beacuse, quite naturally, both sides lied about their successes (exaggerated), setbacks (diminished) and loses (underestimated). Among the english language studies that used extensively I can only mention Dr. Lieven and Alexand Mikaberidze. Plus to some limited extent Arnold. Maybe there are others, I didn't read them.
What I write about Berezina is based on Vasiliev's studies of the subject. It's a great study intensely exploiting sources of Russian, French, Polish, German and Itallian origin. It feels rather realistic and rather good. Hope you understand that I can neither quote nor translate a book several hundred pages long in a language you can't read. So it comes down to urging you believe my word. Not the best argument, I admit. But the english article on Wiki you mentioned is much worse.
_________________


Leib-Guard Cuirassiers Regiment's
General-Fieldmareshal Count Anton Kosyanenko
Commanding Astrakhan grenadiers regiment
2nd Grenadiers Division, Russian Contingent