Okay ?
I do not know the in's and out's of this but I feel the repercussions. There are people arguing for him and against him. Is there anyway that the staff officers, heads of armies, i.e. those that would be in a position to know the in's and out's of this argument can get together and decide what should be done.
I do not feel that a membership wide or even AAA wide vote would be based on "knowledge". If those in "power" within the club decide he should stay, fine; if those in "power" within this club decide he should go, fine; by "me". Perhaps we can solve this issue and get back to being a happy band of brothers.
This suggestion probably defies all club rules but every coup de tat (why do we use French phrases that I can't spell?) breaks constitutional rules. Sometimes for good, sometimes not for good.
I do not wish to defect to Blitz, Blitz is a bit like a dating web site - no interaction within the group, just meet for battle. This club gives a feeling of belonging. It encourages interaction, help and guidance. This makes the experience more enjoyable.
I am speaking as an outsider (wrong word but cant think of the correct one just now) who wonders why the club has got itself into this mess.
Yes I am floundering in the dark here trying to think of ways to get back to being a happy band of brothers.
PLEASE PLEASE can not someone sort out this mess?
I would like to point out that I am speaking for "me". If others agree fine, if not let me know. As Scott pointed out we are probable a bunch of middle aged men, given the purpose of this site we are probably reasonable intelligent, well at least to a level beyond being able to play pac man

Then again I was never any good at that

Just for the record re "middle aged". I have been know to remonstrate with people at work who refer to those in their 60's as elderly, and in another 10 years will probably say the same for those in their 70's

So some in the club will probably deny being middle aged. I mean no ageist insult.