On the note of the rules issue, for sure there are certainly issues with it, but I have never heard you or anyone bring these issues up before. I find it interesting that you choose to now. Either which way, regardless of the outcome, I suggest you submit your concerns to the Cabinet.
Again I don't doubt your supportive nature one bit. But your support has been for the forum recently, you don't maintain the Club website anymore, Marco builds it and you just upload it, not a huge task. I think what Scott Clawson was trying to drive at, that I alluded to is there is currently two French Army Corps, for which websites are not there anymore or the webmaster is gone from the Club. It has been that way for all of this year.
I am not sure if the French command asked you for help, but when the Prussian Army back in the day lost it's stats keeper, I stepped up right away, when our webmaster stepped down, I stepped up. When the ACWGC lost the ANV Commander, a Theater Commander, Corps Commander, Division Commander, Main CSA website, Corps Websites, Army websites, guess what, I stepped up on all those occasions. When the CCC needed a British Army webmaster and then a few years later a CiC, guess what, I stepped up. But I don't rest on the fact that I helped on all these occasions. I don't rest on the success we had for almost 10 years at the iNWC. I wasn't head of it nor the owner, but did a lot of work and was constantly there to build new pages, guide officers and commanders to do what I could to make it work. I loved it and I love these places too. I love meeting the people, getting to know them and talking with them. I envision all sorts of things for these Clubs. No one is doubting how much we all love these places, you wouldn't of started it if you didn't love it.
But being hands on as a leader is key. Being head of the Club and hands on is very key. Look at Blake Strickler, President at the ACWGC, burst on the scene and made a lot of good changes. Actively engaged in the forum. Also encouraging members along, a smiling face each and every day. How involved is he, to the tune of 994 posts in 1 1/2 years.
At the ACWGC, you have only posted 258 times in 10 years. Here at the NWC it has been only 110 posts in 10 years, of which 7 have been for these past few weeks. Mark Jones has made 356 posts in in about a year and a half too.
Until this debate, you only posted 2 other times this year, last time being March of 2011. In the past year only 5 posts.As someone who does a lot of forum work, I would of hoped you would of been more engaging on it.
I quote:
Quote:
I am an avid wargamer and often visit websites. I have most of the games on the market. I help with game testing. I even design my own wargames, Napoleonic, ACW and hope one day to publish them.
But you have been outright opposed to the new games added in the Club, you stated it in this post:
http://www.wargame.ch/board/nwc/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=9716Which was your last post in March of this year. AGEOD is being played, so is Commander: Napoleon at War and Crown of Glory. The French Army has gained recruits who play these games.
Quote again:
Quote:
I have been playing wargames since the lat 60's and have have hundreds of games,Avalon Hill GRD/GDW, SPI and S&T wargames in my collection. I consider myself a very strong player. Since I have been playing the JT games since 1996 it is very normal that I play less and choose who I play with. It is difficult for me to start games with the newcomers because of the difference in skill level. I was hoping to introduce an advance game course to improve the skill of players. This is something that I have toyed with for some time.
Mark Jones was trained by the venerable Andy Moss, Mark has gone on to train many men, as a Brigade Commander he has played most of the officers of his Brigade, improved their morale, confidence and skill. As a leader you need to do these things. These are your men. I don't expect everyone to have the patience to teach, but to reach out and game with your men, especially as a Brigade Commander, which you & Mark are is very key. You both are the front lines! Your men look up to you! As a Founder of the Club, the whole Club looks to you.
Now one doubts your legacy or commitment, I just think someone who should be President of this Club, in a time of need needs to be Out In Front. A Club of Leaders!