Napoleonic Wargame Club (NWC)

The Rhine Tavern

*   NWC   NWC Staff   NWC Rules   NWC (DoR) Records   About Us   Send Email Inquiry to NWC

*   La Grande Armée Quartier Général    La Grande Armée Officer Records    Join La Grande Armée

*   Allied Coalition   Allied Officers   Join Coalition

*   Coalition Armies:   Austro-Prussian-Swedish Army   Anglo Allied Army (AAA)   Imperial Russian Army

 

Forums:    ACWGC    CCC     Home:    ACWGC    CCC
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 10:29 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:34 am
Posts: 3603
Location: Republic of Galveston Texas USA
Should the game in 100 days go on if the two leaders are killed? Should it have stop once the leader was killed? And why does this not affect the Army on a whole, unlike a Corps commander or a Div commander’s death!

General de Brig Kliff Marbot
II Corps Art Res Division .Commander
Marechal de Camp AN


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:21 am
Posts: 594
Location: New Zealand
Good question.

My view would be if Napoleon was killed yes the whole campaign would cease. The Marshals would have surely not have been unable to sieze control of the political landscape. I cannot see Davout or Ney taking anything but temporary control and both would have been keen for peace...Ney maybe hot footing it for America or maybe New Zealand [:D].

If Wellington was killed on the 18th I believe Waterloo would have had the same outcome. It was Napoleon's loss more than Wellington's victory. Bluchers arrival would have been unchanged. Gniesneau I believe chose Wavre without Blucher's input and I think Gniesnau really would have arrived, later and in less numbers but still effective. Napoleon didn't have the troops left!

However thats not a given.

If Wellington had been killed prior to the 18th I think all sorts of what ifs are opened up!! Both military with the immediate campaign, moral on both the Anglo-Duch army, public and politics in Britian and on the allied alliance/position as a whole in Europe subsequently.

The allies I believe would have continued even without Wellington in the short term as they were to far committed. It would have been a protracted 1814 all over again, with the outcome even less assured for them than 1814!

Had Napoleon won at Waterloo with or without Wellington/Blucher's death I think a peace would have been concluded soon after or after L'Emperor's next major victory against the Russians/Austrians!

My humble opinion.

Wellington killed at Quatra Bra on the 16th? What a great what if!!

Col Mike Ellwood
Konig Regt
1 Bde, 22 Div
VII Saxon Corps, ADR


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 5:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 22, 2001 10:35 pm
Posts: 189
Location: USA
I think if Davout had been at Waterloo and Napoleon was killed he would have been able to handle the army, in fact I believe he would be able to defeat Wellington. Now Davout in Paris after Napoleon's defeat and abdication was able to get some concessions out of Wellington and the Allies, with the threat of using the French Army. Davout had a great reputation and they remembered how he held out in Hamburg after Napoleon's first abdication.

Maréchal Tony R.Malone, Comte d'Auvergne et Duc de Vauchamps: Division d'Infanterie de la Moyenne Garde; "The Guard may die, But it never surrenders".
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:34 am
Posts: 3603
Location: Republic of Galveston Texas USA
Monsieur as far as this 100 days contest is concern?

General de Brig Kliff Marbot
II Corps Art Res Division .Commander
Marechal de Camp AN


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:34 am
Posts: 3603
Location: Republic of Galveston Texas USA
Monsieur as far as this 100 days contest is concern?

General de Brig Kliff Marbot
II Corps Art Res Division .Commander
Marechal de Camp AN


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 10:18 am
Posts: 6158
I would disagree with you Tony. I think that Napoleon's personality is what caused the campaign to happen anyway and no matter how well Davout was (and I am a big fan of his) he could not have stopped the men from departing from the ranks.

I think that the player's should decide this prior to the game. I have seen players use Napoleon in a cavalry charge and I captured him on turn 12 or sooner!

Same thing has happened with Wellington. Sometimes people forget where he is and just attach a "leader" to a charge or formation and advance him.

I also see players moving large stacks of leaders forward not realizing that they are doing this.

I would say that if the players agreed to call the game before they start play that that is very historical. Much more for Napoleon though than Wellington.

One note: while some may think that "hunting Napoleon" is wrong anyone that doesn't surround him with adequate troops is asking for some cav squadron to gather him in as a trophy. So while I dont agree with the entire Allied army marching to take one leader to win you also could make a claim for a Darwin award for anyone that leaves him unprotected too! [:p]

Colonel Bill Peters
Armee du Rhin - V Corps, Cavalerie du V Corps, 20ème légère Brigade de Cavalerie, 13ème Hussar Regiment
HPS Napoleonic Scenario Designer (Eckmuhl, Wagram, Jena-Auerstaedt and ... more to come)
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2001 8:49 am
Posts: 1072
Location: USA
I agree with Bill on this. Sure, the French military was disgruntled under the restoration with how they were treated, and much of France was unhappy with the return of the Bourbons, but the focal point of it all was Nappy. He gave it meaning and without him there was nothing for them to fight for. No symbol, vision of what what come next. Davout and Soult, despite their talents, lacked the political currency to win or really even fight a war, even if Napoleon had been killed in a skirmish the day before Ligny.

The Brits without Wellington would be interesting. I am not sure who had the battlefield presence (and who would have succeeded him). It was not enough to be competent, one had to have the gaul to believe Nappy could be beaten. I would guess they would have executed an orderly withdrawal and been out of the campaign for a while, leading to the Prussians a falling back or being smashed.

Then, the big question would be what would happen when the Austrians and Russians showed up. Nappy would certainly have his best organized and equiped army in years, but I do not think the allies would let him stay in power without suffering total defeat...

Feldmarschall Jim 'Prinz' Pfluecke
Commander, Austrian Cavalry Reserve
3 Graf O'Reilly Chevauxleger Rgt
Hahn Grenadier Bn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:08 am
Posts: 3843
Blucher trumps them all!! [:p][:D]

Sorry, just had to.

<center>--------------------------------------------------------
Image
General der Infanterie Scott Kronprinz "Vorwärts" Ludwig von Preußen
(Old Windy) (Windbagfrankfurter) (The Mad Prussian) (Herr Windbagenführer)
Generalquartiermeister der Preußischen Armee
Kommandeur Garde-Grenadier-Korps
Königlich Preußische Armee am Niederrhein
Webmaster & Club Cabinet - Public Relations Officer
Vorwärts Meine Kinder, Vorwärts!!

[url="http://www.prussianarmy.com/"]Königliche Preußische Armee[/url]
[url="http://www.networkforgood.org"]Network for Good[/url]

[url="http://napoleonicwargaming.com"]Napoleonic Wargaming - INWC[/url]</center>


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:34 am
Posts: 3603
Location: Republic of Galveston Texas USA
So what you saying if you kill the Prussi Commander that it would have really been over even though he was ten hours away?

General de Brig Kliff Marbot
II Corps Art Res Division .Commander
Marechal de Camp AN


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:21 am
Posts: 594
Location: New Zealand
Clif,

No, if Blucher was killed or captured , which he nearly was, I think the Prussians would have still gone to the aid of the Anglo-Dutch and therefore his removal is the least problamatic.

If Napoleon is removed then yes the campaign should end in a Allied victory.

If Wellington is removed at Waterloo I think the fight should still continue. If however he is killed before the 18th then its really diffcult to predict the future.

Col Mike Ellwood
Konig Regt
1 Bde, 22 Div
VII Saxon Corps, ADR


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:34 am
Posts: 3603
Location: Republic of Galveston Texas USA
Monsieur the broad called it a draw mesi!

General de Brig Kliff Marbot
II Corps Art Res Division .Commander
Marechal de Camp AN


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2001 8:49 am
Posts: 1072
Location: USA
Mike, I am not so sure about Blucher. Who would have taken command at that point? Gneisau (sp, I know, I have no idea how to spell his name)? Would he have acted so agressively? Obviously, if the troops were in MArch and Blucher was killed at Plancenoit, then the results would have been as with history IMHO.

Feldmarschall Jim 'Prinz' Pfluecke
Commander, Austrian Cavalry Reserve
3 Graf O'Reilly Chevauxleger Rgt
Hahn Grenadier Bn


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:21 am
Posts: 594
Location: New Zealand
Hi Jim,

Gniesneau had already decided on Wavre as the rally point and though history indicates he was keen to then continue the retreat to Liege, even without Blucher's presence on the 16th I believe he would have still marched to the sound of the guns, albiet without the same preparedness and drive. The battle would have had the same result, later and not so decisive however.

I believe the Prussians were committed to supporting the Anglo-Dutch even though Gniesneau was not keen, the quartermaster General Grolmann was said to be for it. I think honour and the operational plan would have meant had he not Gniesneau would have been a coward, which he certainly was not.

To simulate this it would be easy to delay the Prussian arrival by half an hour or an hour and restrict the force to just Bulow's and maybe Pirch's Corps.

However no Blucher on the 17/18 and no Wellington on the 17/18th? Even Napoleon's worst day would have been saved [:D]

Col Mike Ellwood
Konig Regt
1 Bde, 22 Div
VII Saxon Corps, ADR


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2003 10:08 am
Posts: 3843
Gneisenau made the fateful decision. After Ligny when Blucher was missing in the rout, Gneisenau took it upon himself, even though he distrusted the British & Wellington and moved the Armee towards the Brits instead of away, as was agreed that either force would come to the aid of the other if attacked.

It was this decision alone that setup the fateful next day events. That is what I celebrate in my Promise Not Forgotten posts....the Promise the Prussians made to Wellington and they fulfilled it.

But no one had the gusto and bravado the way Blucher did to win that battle & the war. Ever since 1806 it was his sole mission to drive the lil' Corporal out of power.....and he did, twice. [:D]

<center>--------------------------------------------------------
Image
General der Infanterie Scott Kronprinz "Vorwärts" Ludwig von Preußen
(Old Windy) (Windbagfrankfurter) (The Mad Prussian) (Herr Windbagenführer)
Generalquartiermeister der Preußischen Armee
Kommandeur Garde-Grenadier-Korps
Königlich Preußische Armee am Niederrhein
Webmaster & Club Cabinet - Public Relations Officer
Vorwärts Meine Kinder, Vorwärts!!

[url="http://www.prussianarmy.com/"]Königliche Preußische Armee[/url]
[url="http://www.networkforgood.org"]Network for Good[/url]

[url="http://napoleonicwargaming.com"]Napoleonic Wargaming - INWC[/url]</center>


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 5:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:21 am
Posts: 594
Location: New Zealand
General der Infanterie Scott Kronprinz "Vorwärts" Ludwig von Preußen

No he didn't![:D]

A coalition of monarchist worried about their own fat asses drove thousands of serfs to do their dirty work for them! Blucher was just another of the tools that they used. [;)]

Europe would not have plunged into the 20th century's horrors had the 'Code Napoleon' been europe wide![B)]

Freemen still celebrate L'Emperor! [:D]

Col Mike Ellwood
Konig Regt
1 Bde, 22 Div
VII Saxon Corps, ADR


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
POWERED_BY
Localized by Maël Soucaze © 2010 phpBB.fr