<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by SansSouci</i>
Besides, I don't buy all the nonsense about history being crucial to the British army...
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
It has always appeared to me that it is the public more than the army that considers the continuation of individual regimental traditions important. The army usually points out that it is small unit cohesion, discipline and a sense of purpose in the first place that makes people fight, and that the pride of belonging to an old regiment with a history of having fought on all battlefields since Marlborough is nice, but not a crucial factor.
In amalgamation in the 1960s, the army was primarily afraid that it would increasingly lose its ties with society when local regiments were merged. The reform of the Territorial Army was a concern there as well.
<center>
D.S. "Green Horse" Walter, Maréchal d'Empire
Duc des Pyramides, Comte de Normandie
Commandant la [url="http://home.arcor.de/dierk_Walter/NWC/3_VI_AdR_Home.htm"]3e Division Bavaroise[/url], L'Armée du Rhin
Commandant [url="http://home.arcor.de/dierk_Walter/NWC/EdM_start.htm"]L'Ecole de Mars[/url], L'Armée du Rhin
Commandant des Grenadiers à Pied de la Vieille Garde, "les Grognards"

</center>