<blockquote id="quote"><font size="3" face="book antiqua" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Jim Pfleck</i>
<br />I would play them more if the AI was better. As it is now, I tried the couple ones in Jena and still it was not good. If it was better, I would play them to try things out and try some harder to win battles against the AI.
Feldmarschall Jim 'Prinz' Pfluecke
Commander, Austrian Cavalry Reserve
3 Graf O'Reilly Chevauxleger Rgt
Hahn Grenadier Bn
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
I tend to agree with you and Ernie. No matter how well we script the AI it turns out better to not use scripts at all and just set the AI settings in the Header to use the AI Orders (Extreme Defend, Normal Defend, etc.).
However, there are customers out there that dont want to play in clubs and funny enough do constitute enough sales to cause us to want to review the amount that we have in each game.
The main set we are talking about here are what I term "stock" scenarios. Those that you see when you open the battle engine and select from the list. As you know in my titles I dont put campaign scenarios in the main directory any more. Thus while Jena had over 400 scenarios total there were only a total of 44 "stock" scenarios or those that you would see in the Scenario Selection dialog.
Only 3 of the Jena scenarios besides the Getting Started scenario were intended to be played solo. I figure that I could look at several of the smaller actions and put some sort of scripting together or just use the AI Orders and just boost the VP count against the Human player.
Anyway, really appreciate the input from you fellers.
Bill Peters
Armee du Rhin - V Corps, Cavalerie du V Corps, 20ème légère Brigade de Cavalerie, 13ème Hussar Regiment
HPS Napoleonic Scenario Designer (Eckmuhl, Wagram, Jena-Auerstaedt and ... more to come)
[url="http://www.fireandmelee.net"]Fire and Melee Wargame site[/url]
