First off, I am not whining about any this, but I am looking for some feedback.
<u>The situation:</u>
A full 1812 campaign.
<u>First battle:</u>
A British major victory at Detroit with the vast majority of American troops eliminated. I'm thinking, cool...I won't have to face so many of the traitors next battle. [:)]
<u>Second battle:</u>
In order to avoid the ridiculously ahistorical Bladensburg, (in actuality a huge defeat for the Americans) I made the campaign decision which steered us toward Stoney Creek, where a hard fought minor British victory was achieved with significant American losses. But not only had the Americans come on map in full force, the after game report mentioned a "Draw Path". Ok, a major win and a minor win and the campaign's still a draw, I'll deal with it. [8)]
<u>Third battle:</u>
I find myself at Bladensburg anyway. American units that I can see appear to be full strength again, and I'm grossly outnumbered, again, on a battlefield that IMO gives a big advantage to the boys in blue. This is not looking good. [8]
<u>My conclusions:</u>
Casualties are <b>not</b> being carried over in campaign games as expected. Even my army appeared to be full strength in the last two engagements.
Victories have little if any impact on campaign branching. How can an army be nearly wiped out in the initial battle, that same army suffer significant casualties in the next battle, and the following battle I'm facing a 3:2 ratio in men, and am in fact at an extreme battlefield disadvantage??
None of this is a reflection on my or my opponents play. I raise these points in question of the game's campaign mechanics, or maybe I'm just missing something here that someone can fill me in on. I have to answer to Lord Cornwallis you know, and he's missed his last two shipments of tea for some reason, and is not in a good mood. [;)]
|